If you planned Purchase of the game monitor, In the first of all, it is necessary to decide how much money you are willing to allocate for a new acquisition. Most of the new models presented on the market are well forgotten old. For true quality improvements manufacturers require a lot of money.
At the second stage, decide Will a new purchase only for games or you plan to work on it. It often happens that a person is seriously engaged in a photo or video, but at the same time he likes to spend a couple of hours a day for his favorite toys. Here is necessary Multifunctional device, which in the market is a huge set . But if the consumer declares the necessary speed, and it closes his eyes to other parameters, then this option is also picking up, the main thing is to accurately determine the parameters you need.
What do you pay attention to
Most models are equipped with the aspect ratio of 16: 9 , and the diagonal starts with 23.5 inches and ends 32. If you do not have very good vision, then the diagonal may be more (but not at all necessary). Than More distance to the monitor , the impressive screen diagonally you can afford.
The key characteristic of the monitor is its matrix. Types of matrices are set, they originate from the main:
- TN-matrix - Not new on the market, differ low color reproduction and reduced brightness. An exception can be TN-options with a frequency of 200Hz upgrades that use gamers in dynamic games.
- IPS matrices - You should pay attention to this type, since it perfectly transmits the color and has a viewing angles of 178 degrees.
- Va-matrix - This is something average between the first and second option. Have pretty good clarity, color reproduction and impressive viewing angles. Of the disadvantages - a long time of the response.
Response time. It is expressed in milliseconds and shows that How much time will be needed to monitor to change the frame. The optimal indicator is 5 ms and less. A large indicator can break the image.
Light brightness and contrast. The first characteristic in gaming monitors varies within 250-300 kD in sq.m. For contrast, Ideal 1: 3000.
Our ranking will be considered The best game monitors that showed themselves in dynamic scenes Different with multifunctionality and high-quality matrices. The ranking presents:
1. Xiaomi Mi Surface Display 34 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
2. AOC C24G1 24 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
3. LG 29UM69G 29 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
4. LG 25UM58 25 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
5. HP OMEN 25 24.5 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
6. SAMSUNG C27JG50QQQI 26.9 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
7. SAMSUNG U28E590D 28 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
8. AOC G2460VQ6 24 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
9. BenQ Zowie XL2411P 24 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
10. Xiaomi Mi Display 23.8 " - Find out where cheaper all >>>
1st place. Xiaomi Mi Surface Display 34
Advanced game or delicate brand monitor Xiaomi Mi Surface Display is equipped with a diagonal of 34 pieces which is good for most modern games. Widescreen LCD screen has a resolution of 3440x1440 points and a matrix Va . The maximum update rate is declared for 144Hz.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
With this monitor, you will not see the lights and will not be disappointed in the purchase, since the device has a thin frame and high quality picture. The brightness of the screen is 300 cd / m², the contrast is incredibly pleased - 3000: 1 . The screen is curved, it is very convenient in use, attached to the stand with a magnetic holder, which allows you to change the height and rotate the screen to the sides. Equipped with a semmat surface and anti-cancer coating.
Middle ranking - 4.7
- Famous manufacturer.
- Non-standard aspect ratio.
- Curved screen.
- Contrast is excellent (3000: 1).
- Response time 4ms.
- Viewing angles 178Gradusov.
- Bright LED backlight.
2nd place. AOC C24G1 24 "
Monitor AOC C24G1 small diagonal in 24 pieces is equipped with a good resolution of 1920x1080 points and frequency of updating frames of 146 Hz. VA screen matrix type, backlight - wised. The brightness is 250 kD / m², which is optimal for the standard game screen. Contrast is also at the level and declared for 3000: 1.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
Response time is stated for 4ms, Excellent natural color reproduction and wide viewing angles . The steady metal stand will not creak and not the backlash, the assembly at a decent level. The design is pretty concise, there are elegant frames and good adjustment in height.
Middle ranking - 4.7
- Low price.
- Excellent response time.
- High clarity and contrast.
- Adjusted in height.
- Wall mount.
- Wide viewing angles.
- The picture can be blurred in dynamic scenes.
3rd place. LG 29UM69G 29 "
This monitor from a well-known reliable manufacturer LG 29UM69G has an excellent diagonal of 29 inches and is suitable for most modern toys. . It is the game monitor LCD format with wide viewing angles.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
Resolution is 2560x1080 points, Screen matrix - IPS. Maximum frame update rate - 75 Hz. Very worthy monitor from the famous brand with an excellent high-quality image and detailed picture . Very good assembly and high-class speakers with which it is not necessary to use the speakers.
Middle ranking - 4.7
- Famous manufacturer.
- Strong assembly and quality of materials.
- Good picture quality.
- No lights.
- Excellent stereo colors (2 pieces of 5 W).
4th place. LG 25UM58 25 "
LG 25UM58 game ordeal monitor has Diagonal 25 inches and wide viewing angles, which makes it worthy of our rating , also quite high position. Stably reproduces colors, and a sufficiently small response time (5 ms) will allow you to enjoy graphics without blending and braking.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
The model supports Resolution 2560x1080 pixels, Contrast DFC Mega and Limit Brightness 250 CD / m² What gives him advantages to many competitors. Examine modern design and IPS matrix and make this monitor with a favorite among many players.
Average rating - 4.6
- Famous brand technique.
- Examine display.
- IPS-matrix screen.
- Anti-reflective screen coating.
- You can hang on the wall.
5th place. HP OMEN 25 24.5 "
Game monitor HP Omen 25 with a diagonal of 24.5 inches is not accidental in our ranking of the best devices 2020 . For a small cost, the user will receive a technological design and high-quality body assembly.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
It has quite wide viewing angles ( 170 degrees horizontally ), matte screen with anti-cancer coating. We want to mention color reproduction - it is at a decent level, Since the colors are very deep and saturated. The screen is very bright, the backlight at the maximum values simply blinds.
Middle Rating - 4.5
- Wide viewing angles.
- Anti-reflective screen coating.
- Bright backlight.
- High-quality assembly.
- The picture is perfect: clear and smooth.
- Stand may be fused.
6th place. SAMSUNG C27JG50QQI 26.9 "
The monitor from the non-sensitive manufacturer of digital equipment Samsung C27JG50QQI has an optimal diagonal for most cases - 26.9 inches.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
Pretty Attractive cost pushes the user to purchase, The maximum refresh rate of frames in 144 Hz is fixing the decision to purchase a model. Classic resolution and is 2560x1440 pixels , Aspect ratio 16: 9. The VA matrix is distinguished by wide viewing angles and good color reproduction.
Average rating - 4.6
- Reliable manufacturer.
- Value for money.
- Strong assembly.
- No backlash and lights.
- Excellent permission.
- Beautiful color reproduction.
- Brightness 300 cd / m².
- Contrast 3000: 1.
- The curved screen is very convenient.
- No Freesync and G-Sync.
7th place. Samsung u28e590d 28 "
Samsung U28E590D has an excellent larger diagonal of 28 inches and high resolution which is the main advantage of the device. The colors are very bright, clear and dense, the viewing angles are left to desire the best because of the TN matrix. The housing is not remarkable, rather concise and simple.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
Of the minuses, this is not a very reliable stand. With this monitor, you can not only play, but also watch movies with TV shows which look at this screen is very worthy. This diagonal is optimal and to perform work tasks.
Middle Rating - 4.5
- Large diagonal.
- Good permission.
- Universality of the monitor.
- There is a visual resting mode.
- The backlight does not flicker.
8th place. AOC G2460VQ6 24 "
Display AOC G2460VQ6 has a small diagonal of 24 inches, pleases with a small response time (1 ms), Which allows you to eliminate blur in dynamic scenes of your favorite games.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
The VGA, HDMI and DisplayPort connectors will help simultaneously display data from different devices. For long battles and long-term work, the G2460VQ6 monitor has an Anti-Blue Light option, removing the stress from the eye and the boost comfort from viewing.
Middle ranking - 4.7
- Low cost.
- Optimal permission for a similar price.
- Illuminated wised.
- Brightness 250 cd / m²
- Contrast 1000: 1
- Response time 1 ms.
9th place. Benq zowie xl2411p 24 "
The BenQ Zowie XL2411P screen with a small diagonal is very quickly responded to user actions. Equipped with a large set of features in the menu, as well as high-level assembly. Equipped with a DISPLAY PORT cable included.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
There is a convenient stand with the possibility of optimal adjustment in height and inclination. The monitor is equipped with a matte screen with anti-glare : Now you will be visible all the details even with sunny weather.
Middle ranking - 4.7
- Good cost.
- The optimum ratio of price and quality.
- Comfortable leg.
- DISPLAY PORT cable included.
- Warm colors.
- Matte coating of the monitor is rapidly contaminated.
10th place. Xiaomi Mi Display 23.8 "
And again in our ranking a monitor from this manufacturer Xiaomi Mi Display, Only now with a diagonal of 23.8 inches. It is distinguished by high-quality assembly, quality of parts and low cost, for which gaming and love this monitor.
Find out where cheaper all >>>
It is highlighted with thin frames and rather stylish performance. Of the disadvantages, this is quite strong flicker, from which the eyes get tired. Permission for this class is worthy and amounts to 1920x1080 points, the type of screen matrix - IPS.
Middle ranking - 4.7
- Famous manufacturer.
- IPS-matrix screen.
- Surprised monitor on the market.
- Many positive user reviews.
- The flicker from which the eyes get tired.
- Minimum settings.
We picked up for you Ten modern relevant monitors who managed to evaluate the gamers around the world. Choose your favorite option and rejoice at the purchase for a long time.
/ Have a good acquisition of a new monitor!
In recent years, in the consciousness of consumers, the concept of "game monitor" was clearly populated, which the marketing departments of manufacturing companies sought so long. Now, few people think about the fact that decades (!) We played with the models with not the fastest matrices, with the standard frequency of the vertical sweep in 60 Hz and without any additional technologies that improve the perception of the gameplay. And most importantly - almost no one complained.
Coming to the store in 2018 (or choosing independently on the Internet) and putting the task to select a display with an eye on frequent online battles, many refuse to consider models with a frequency of less than 100 Hz, even if the previous monitor did not differ in high speed and Everything seems to be completely satisfied, and now it just got the opportunity to buy something new. Such buyers are easy to understand, because progress does not stand still, the visual difference between 60 and 120 Hz is confirmed by almost all users, and therefore, if there is a financial opportunity, sin has to abandon the modern goods of the IT industry.
Questions when choosing such monitors, ultimately often speaking universal solutions, perhaps there are somewhat larger than when selecting displays with less excuses of consciousness of most of the public characteristics. To simplify this task and help you spend significantly less than your precious time, we decided to tell about the basic criteria of choice (in a fairly brief form) game models and bring specific examples of optimal, in our opinion, options from available on sale.
Where to begin
First of all, as in the purchase of any other technology, you need to clearly decide on the budget: plan the amount you are ready to part relatively easily, and put the maximum bar to which you are ready to rise if necessary - to get the best of the most Suitable for your requests. Without this, the process of choice can stretch for a long time, and if you connect to this a constant expectation of what manufacturers will be present in a month / quarter / six months, it is at all per year or two, and even to infinity.
Here we note the following: Practice shows that most of the new ones in the monitors market are well forgotten old in the new "wrapper", and for real and serious improvements, manufacturers are at first asking unnecessarily many. Thus, in most cases, it is necessary to focus on tested technologies or be prepared to overpay for novelty and additional features / features.
In the second stage, it is necessary to decide whether the new monitor will be the only one on your desktop used to perform a variety of tasks, or it will be the second and will be applied exclusively for games without serious requests to the quality of the picture - from this highly depends on the type of use used for you Matrix. There are often cases when a person is professionally engaged in photography, video or graphics, but does not refuse himself the pleasure of spending a couple of hours behind the gameplay and wants to get a high-quality device "for everything immediately." Then the choice is dramatically limited and simplified. Similarly, in the event that the buyer simply needs the fastest monitor on the market, and he is ready to close his eyes to all its shortcomings, even if there are many of these flaws.
Next, we immediately go directly to the technical points of choice, not forgetting that in this material we will consider only the segment of these "game monitors", to which exclusively models can be ranked with a vertical sweep frequency of 100 Hz and above. We know that many manufacturers are trying to attribute to this class and models from 60-75 Hz, but let it remain on their conscience, because with the same success of "game" it was possible to name almost all decisions issued for the last 10-15 years - Difference only in support of adaptive synchronization systems that remove breaks and some jerking pictures, but not capable of increasing the smoothness of what is happening on the screen while maintaining the already familiar frequency of the vertical sweep.
What are the characteristics and what they affect
Diagonal and aspect ratio
Diagonal and aspect ratio - characteristics that, oddly enough, have some dependence on each other. In the market of modern gaming (!) High random monitors you can meet models of two main formats (16: 9 and 21: 9) and a pair of actually exclusive monitors with a non-standard ratio 32: 9 and 32:10.
With usually we all models with the aspect ratio of 16: 9, the screen diagonal starts from 23.5 inches and ends at the level of 32-inch solutions. Fast "cinema" displays 21: 9 are limited to a diagonal of 34-35 inches, and ultrashire is offered in size 43 and 49 inches. The choice here can be founded as on personal experience (for example, your monitor eventually began to seem small and want more), and on the physical ability to place a large display on the table, work tasks, the sphere of interests, the distance from the eye to the screen surface and, Of course, visual sharpness is to be able to do without so far a few problematic Windows OS scaling system.
With the choice of diagonally, the rule is simple:
- the worse vision, the fact that the screen can (but it should not) be more;
- The more working distance, the larger screen you can afford without creating extra problems.
Both rules work in the opposite direction (good vision and small working distance), but, unfortunately, accurate examples of the size of the screen and a comfortable distance to the eye we will not be able to bring.
As for the tips in various sources about a comfortable distance to the screen 1.5-2 times, it is diagonally (for a 24-inch monitor is 92-122 cm), here you can only be surprised and ask for the authors of such tips, whether they often They see on sale Tables at a depth of more than 60-70 cm and is there much more on the monitors market with a stand, which allows you to place the screen almost at the edge of the table. In addition, such tips seem to take into account the urgency of view, which not all boasts.
With the choice of the ratio of the parties, things are a little harder. Here you should decide what you want to get. Frequently watch movies filmed in the right "cinema" format 2.35: 1 / 2.4: 1, prefer to simultaneously see on the window of three and more applications on the screen, we are handling and retouche photos, video editing, and in modern (this is important!) Games will not refuse to expand the field of view? In this case, we strongly recommend choosing among large models 21: 9 and it may be possible to consider the monitors of formats 32: 9 and 32:10, in fact that are "gluing" of two 27-inch Full HD (49-inch option) or two 24-inch WUXGA (43-inch model).
You do not strain black stripes on the sides and generally movies, TV shows and TV shows you like to look at the big TV, prefer to keep everything in sight, love to play old games and do not see anything terrible in a constant transition between multiple applications? With a positive answer, forget about everything, except for standard 16: 9 format models - let them and not the future, but they will be afloat for a very long time. This option is suitable in the event that you simply have no desire to get used to something new, and everything that is different from television 16: 9, you call the "tank gap", as it was 10 years ago and with the first models Full HD standard.
Slightly touch the theme of curved screens. Of course, the fashion on them continues, but the rates of the release of such models decreased, the manufacturers no longer prove so zealously the need to "bend" panels, because for large and, moreover, wide matrices This feature has become the norm that surprises not at all as a couple of years Back. Without it, the color reproduction along the edges of the screen will be stronger from the central zone, the monitors will occupy more workspace, and users will have to turn their heads more often. Work for similar models in CAD programs, engage in 3D modeling is not the most comfortable and pleasant time. Get used to and not notice curved lines (which should be straightforward) is difficult, but with a lot of desire it is quite possible. If the sphere of your activity does not provide for work with such software, then you should not worry about once again - take and do not think. This also applies to small curved displays. In them are curved panel - tribute to fashion and attempt to slightly improve the stability of the picture on the entire area of the matrix.
Depending on the screen diagonally selected and the aspect ratio you can stay with several options for working permissions, and you can be limited to one single option.
Among the game Full HD there are models from 23.5 to 32 inches, UFD (2560 × 1080 pixels) - only 34 inches, WQHD live in a segment of 23.8-31.5-inch solutions, UWQHD will submore you with a diagonal of 34-35 inches, And the speed 4k can now be found only among 27-inch monitors.
The higher the screen resolution, the higher the pixel density level (PPI) directly affecting the clarity of the picture. The difference is clearly visible when the models are placed with different PPI levels next to each other, it strides when moving from a low PPI model to a solution with high, but quickly leveled if the distance to the screen is quite large and just over time - the habit is produced . We will not talk about the need to purchase high-resolution models, we will not, because many still arrange large Full HD models with "fatty pixels", so this moment is very individual. However, if finance and vision allow, it is better to still give preference to models with an increased pixel density.
The second reason for which models with high screen resolution should be considered - the desire to see more without the need for scrolling and disclosing tabs. Of course, the size of the working elements and text will be less (when comparing models with the same diagonal), but the quality of the work of parts will be high. It becomes more comfortable to work, and productivity will increase. In the case of games, the difference will be more determined by the aspect ratio than the working resolution. The only thing that can be calculated when it is increased is to reduce the size of some interface elements, graphic blocks and text. But as far as important it is for the player - a big question!
The third and most important moment for fans to play - the difference in the load on the computing components of the system. Most of all, it affects the graphics subsystem with complex computing. And if for games in the Full HD resolution with medium graphics settings now, NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti (and GTX 1060 for high quality settings, and with a reserve for another a few years), then for WQHD it is better to look in the direction of GTX 1070 and 1070 Ti, For UWQHD (3440 × 1440) - on GTX 1080 and 1080 Ti, and for a comfortable game in 4K, it is advisable to postpone money on the new generation cards - and then you can not think about replacing the next 1-2 years (if you are very lucky). However, if you have a fairly stable 30-40 FPS or you agree on medium and low graphics settings, the list of suitable options can be safely expanded.
Separately, I would like to affect the topic of purchasing a high-resolution monitor and its further use at lower values. An option, of course, the appropriate, when your new video card has not had time to come from the store, but "for constant" to do so, from our point of view, still not worth it. By this you kill the entire meaning of the purchase of an expensive display: the clarity and quality of the picture decreases due to the use of interpolation algorithms. In some models, this mode works better, in other worse, but to achieve the same quality as with a "native" resolution, it will not be accurate.
Types of matrices: advantages and disadvantages
Some 3-4 years ago, only models with TN + FILM matrices could be attributed to this game monitors, however, they did not fully suit those who wish to obtain a universal device - not only fast, but also with accurate color reproduction, stable picture and good viewing angles. After the first 120-hertz TN appeared, it was over 5 years old, but now you can find a quick monitor on sale for every taste and wallet.
We highlight the main advantages and disadvantages of each type of matrices encountered in game models.
TN + FILM. :
- +High availability (with rare exception)
- +Maximum response speed and options with the highest vertical sweep frequency (200-240 Hz)
- −Bad Viewing Corners, Low Stability Pictures
- −Banding, image prescription
- −The pronounced "Crystal Effect" (not always, but often)
* VA-TYPE (SVA, MVA, AMVA) :
- +Deep black color (with rare exception)
- +Imperceptive "Crystal Effect"
- Medium viewing angles and stability pictures
- Banding, bad gradients (not always, but often)
- −Black-Crush effect
- −The lowest response rate (especially on dark transitions)
IPS-Type (IPS, Ahva, Pls) :
- +High response speed (in most cases)
- +Almost indistinguishable "Crystal Effect"
- +Good viewing angles and stability pictures
- +Quality gradients and lack of banding
- −Most expensive with other equal (diagonal, resolution, frequency)
You may be surprised, not found in the lists of terms such as "uniformity of the backlight", "Glow-effect", but there is a simple explanation: absolutely all modern matrices of any types can demonstrate as good uniformity of the backlight, and bad; As a greatly pronounced "GLOU", and weakly noticeable. There are no leaders and outsiders. It is necessary to consider and evaluate the type of panel, but a specific model of the matrix installed in the monitor.
Response speed, sweep frequency, insert "black frame"
The fastest, with other things being equal, still remains TN + FILM solutions. They are followed by IPS-Type, and the bronze is getting all * Va-models. Focus on the number of response time specified by manufacturers in TX, it is unambiguously worth it - this is still a profanation. Applied measurement techniques that estimate 1-2 possible color transitions have never allowed the display of the display rate, since in real use of possible transitions - tens of thousands of options, and they all differ in time, sometimes at times.
Focusing it is exclusively on direct comparisons of models (put near and run the same test), instrumental measurements and photos (not the most accurate method, but better than nothing). You will be amazed when you see how different models with the same GRAY Time may differ (GRAY).
From the response time directly Depends the clarity of moving elements / objects on the screen and length of the loop (remnants of the image from the preceding frame). What it is below, the higher the speed of the monitor and the clearer dynamic image.
If you operate with numbers, the maximum time of any color transition should not exceed the time provided by the monitor to one frame (1000 ms / 60 Hz = 16.66 ms or 1000 ms / 144 Hz = 6.94 ms, etc.). The greater the inconsistency, the stronger the plumes. The desire to level this inconsistency will necessarily lead you to the most worthy representatives of the TN + FILM camp or to large spending when buying top IPS solutions.
The frequency of the vertical sweep is the second important parameter by which the monitor should be selected and depends on Visual smoothness of what is happening on the screen . Some of the readers exclaim: "Why is this not the first to the value of the parameter?" We answer: if the matrix is slow, then from the high frequency of the scan of the PROS, but not big. You will be annoyed from the length of the loops, and the whole point of acquiring such a game monitor, just say, is lost.
Decide with the required maximum frequency of vertical sweep - simpler. If you are interested in eSports, participate in professional tournaments, and the main disciplines are playing, where high speed and reaction time are extremely important, it is necessary to look at TN + FILM with a frequency of 180 to 240 Hz. Do you adore to play something similar, but at the amateur level? Then choose the models with a frequency of about 120-144 Hz. Games in your life take less time, and you just want to increase the smoothness of what is happening on the screen? In this case, you can easily fall to the level of 100-120 Hz and not feel discomfort for many years.
For some of its models, manufacturers provide a special backlight operation with the so-called "black frame insert" (ULMB, ELMB, etc.). When it is activated, the backlight switches to the pulse mode and works synchronously with the screen update frequency, synchronizing and the frequency of the output frames. ETT monitors work on the same principle.
As a result, we see only endroads without a transition stage: the clarity of objects in the frame increases "to heaven", there are no distinguishable loops (with rare exceptions). The disadvantage of such a light operation modes is an enlarged eye load, and with a small frequency, it is quite likely that some users can even catch unpleasant flicker. In addition, there are some restrictions: the frequency at which the ULMB / ELMB mode can operate, often does not exceed 120-144 Hz, and the joint work in a pair with active G-Sync or Freesync is impossible.
On the other hand, if the monitor is initially very fast (it basically concerns the TN + FILM models with a frequency of 180-240 Hz), then no point in modes with the insertion of the Black Crare. The visual difference is not so big to even strain our visual apparatus with you.
Adaptive Synchronization Technologies (G-Sync, Freesync)
As an additional bonus for players, monitor manufacturers use adaptive synchronization technologies: NVIDIA G-SYNC and AMD Freesync, with each of which we got acquainted in detail earlier. The main task of both is to synchronize the frame generation frequency issued by the GPU, with the screen update frequency, eliminating the horizontal image breakdowns and ensure a higher smooth image in comparison with the usual V-SYNC. The difference between the offers of two swung competitors is the working frequency range (G-Sync it is wider), the image output delay (Freesync is usually less) and, naturally, working with GPUs of certain models. In addition, the work of this technology in Green is provided by a special hardware module, which must be applied in the monitor, which leads to a significant increase in the cost of the finished product. We add to this licensed payments (deductions) NVIDIA, and get a clear answer to the question why so expensive.
In turn, Freesync is the marketing title of the Adaptive-Sync technology introduced in the DisplayPort 1.2 standard specification and its further versions. Manufacturers wishing to support AMD can be absolutely legally legally and free for themselves to sell a monitor with freesync "aboard", which we observe more and more than 80% of the displays with the adaptive synchronization system support precisely the Freesync, although buyers and users of NVIDIA video cards are still all The majority that, at least, proves the Statistics Service Steam.
It is worth noting the AMD technology LFC. (Low Framerate Compensation), which is included in the Freesync complex. It extends the screens update frequency range and increases the smoothness of the gameplay at frequencies up to 30 frames per second. The effectiveness of this method of exposure is still in question for many, since at 30 FPS and less in any case it is difficult to imagine a smooth and comfortable gameplay.
Nvidia's chest has a software technology Fast-Sync. hidden in the depth of the driver settings and is a direct alternative to V-Sync. It appeared not so long ago, and therefore many users do not even know about its existence.
It does not require special monitors to work, it works absolutely on any models (even with the stated support for Freesync). The main thing - the presence in your system installed video card with GPU NVIDIA is preferably from the last two generations, and the new version of the driver.
The usual vertical synchronization of V-SYNC allows us to effectively deal with breaks, but it has significant minuses: Input-Lag and FPS restriction. Fast-Sync also removes breaks and microlags of frames, but it does not observe the growth of the Input-lag, negatively affecting the gameplay. Comparing with G-SYNC, you can mark the high-quality work of Fast-Sync at a very high level of FPS (100 and higher), but if the frame level floats in a wide range (for example, from 40 to more than 100 fps), then the hardware solution turns out to be more Effective. But for this, as you have already understood, you will have to pay a pretty much.
By the way, if you have a NVIDIA video card, and financial capabilities do not allow you to purchase a monitor with the G-SYNC module, do not be upset - boldly buy any other, including the stated support for AMD Freesync, because this feature does not prevent you. The same can be said to users of AMD video cards: if it happened that the monitor you liked to focus more on the "green" fans, it should not affect your choice. Yes, in both cases you will remain without hardware systems of adaptive synchronization, but all other advantages of the monitor will not go anywhere.
You can hardly choose the game monitor on accessible connection interfaces, but we could not pass by this column in the specifications. At the moment, all quick monitors must be equipped with modern DisplayPort and HDMI ports. With DVI-D and, moreover, D-Sub, they have long spare enough.
For DP minimum serves version 1.2 with high frequency support for Full HD permissions to UWQHD and adaptive synchronization technologies. DP is the main interface for gaming models. Squeeze a stable maximum sweep frequency of modern monitors are capable of video cards starting with NVIDIA GTX 960 and AMD RADEON RX 380. Earlier solutions will introduce limits at the level of approximately 160-180 Hz for Full HD and 120 Hz for WQHD.
The latter of the presented versions of DP 1.4 is relevant solely for high-speed UHD 4K models with a frequency of 120-144 Hz and full support for HDR due to the multi-zone backlight system. For models, a simpler DP 1.4 will not provide any advantages over the remaining most popular DP 1.2 / 1.2a.
The HDMI interface in most cases is installed by manufacturers to connect game consoles and third-party players. Its version 1.4 / 1.4b is enough for the average rate of Full HD solutions (not higher than 144 Hz), and HDMI 2.0 will make limitations in the form of maximum 144 Hz for WQHD and 100 Hz for UWQHD. Together with HDMI, only AMD Freesync adaptive synchronization technologies are possible. For NVIDIA G-SYNC, DisplayPort 1.2 is required and higher.
One of the most modern connection options is USB Type-C - it starts to appear everything in more new products, but it should be perceived only as a pleasant addition. Its abilities are quite limited, so manufacturers are counting on 60-75 Hz, without supporting any adaptive synchronization technology.
To attract buyers to your models, manufacturers are hanging "tons of labels", painting in the colors the advantages of those or other software technologies, often only spoiling the final image on the screen.
When choosing should not be guided by dozens of pre-installed modes for games of different genres. You have two, the maximum of three (including the default activated) of them, and to make the most important changes to increase the probability of victory in the next battle will help the functions of the type "Stabilizer of black" (To change visibility in deep shadows) during manual setting.
Often it is useless to "technologies" of increasing sharpness ( Super Sharpness, Vividpixel, Clarity ), working very roughly and negatively affecting the elaboration of small details. Various systems a la LOW BLUE LIGHT. that reduce the blue component of the spectrum, the calibration is also quite useless (but not for everyone). During their work, the illumination brightness is reduced, the color temperature drops to the level of 4000-5500 K, the established gamma curves change in order to reduce the contrast of the image. Such global changes in the image on the screen sometimes lead to confusion and do not leave wishes to stop at similar colors. In addition, if you continue to sit on the monitor, without making full-fledged breaks in work, then no additional presets will definitely help you - the eyes and head will be hurting.
Names available for activation of functions Low Input-Lag or Extreme Low Input-Lag It is attractive, but in reality they give a small effect (and sometimes they do not give at all), because the overwhelming majority of game models and without additional settings there are no problems with this parameter to which advanced players are very demanding.
An important positive feature of the modern monitor can be recognized Flicker-Free backlight (without flicker). It has the overwhelming majority of game displays, but there are exceptions in which the hybrid system is used (the flicker is manifested only in a certain range of brightness changes) or the flicker frequency is almost always at the level of 200-400 Hz, which may (but not necessarily) lead to Increased fatigue.
Another useful feature (with some "but"), according to the author, you can recognize an additional naughty sight that the monitor "draws" independently - strictly centered the center of the screen. This is definitely the choice of not the most honest players, but what we just go for victory. In this matter, we will probably be without advice.
HDR support - then, without which the newest models cannot do. It is worth understanding the following: The actual expansion of the dynamic range is possible only due to the multi-zone backlight, which is currently applied only in the most expensive (more expensive than 150 thousand rubles) game models. All other options are the names for the sake, even if the monitor has a color coverage is wider than standard SRGB. Manufacturers make support for EOTF gamma correction, directly affecting gamma curves and finite image contrast, but nothing supernatural occurs. Almost the same you could do in our old monitors, simply setting up a different gamma mode (closer to the average value of 2.4) and increasing the color saturation.
Complements this list so-called "Advanced Color Coverage" which manufacturers make an increasing rate. For games, it seems to us, it is not bad at all, but for lovers of the whole bright, contrasting, saturated - and at all that the doctor prescribed. If you buy a universal monitor, followed by working with color, then you should give preference to models with more familiar color coverage at the SRGB level. Focus on promoted about the last two years DCI-P3. It follows only if you are creating a video content, which in the future it is planned to withdraw on large TV screens.
After you decide with the most suitable characteristics for you, you can go to the next step - the choice of a new monitor. In this section, the author tried to highlight the optimal, in his opinion, the model, with most of whom it was lucky to work tightly. Some of them, no doubt, can be called the best in their segments, others are simply "Hoshists", in the absence of the possibility of getting something better. However, we will try to do without distributing such loud and not very titles, just sending your thoughts into the right track. For convenience, we will be primarily based on the working permission of monitors, but let's start with the familiar Full HD standard.
Full HD (1920 × 1080)
If you wish to get just a fast and low-cheap monitor, preference should be given the BenQ Zowie XL2411P model. There is nothing superfluous in the monitor, but thanks to him, you can decide whether you are ready for modern TN + FILM displays or it is better to immediately begin searching among * VA models (IPS, we will remind, in this class are not presented).
Samsung C24FG73FQI is just one of these options - affordable, small and for lovers * VA-technology. Considering its cost, many expectations are justified, but in speed, this model will in any case be worse than the above-mentioned BenQ and all analogues on TN + FILM.
The fastest, high-quality and small Full HD monitor for the amount of less than 30 thousand rubles can be called Dell Alienware AW2518HF with Freesync support. This is a 24.5-inch solution with the TN + FILM matrix and a frequency of 240 Hz, capable of matching the high level of the game of its owner. If you are interested, similar solutions, but with G-Sync, then the choice will rise between Alienware AW2518H and ASUS PG258Q. The main difference, as always, in price and design. There is no unambiguous winner among them.
Choosing a fast and affordable 27-inch display, you will most likely come over to the new LG 27GK750F. All decision is characteristic of all flaws of TN + Film, but for 26 thousand rubles you will receive a fairly large 240-hertz monitor with Freesync support, which, whose totality, and everything, is not.
Requires a similar monitor, but with G-SYNC? Alas, you will have to fall to 144 Hz and lay out about 8-10 thousand rubles more for Acer Predator XB271HAB. Again strains the TN + FILM matrix? Then the only more or less worthy option is samsung C27FG73FQI on * VA, for which you do not have to overpay.
The latest new features of the Full HD segment are 32-inch * Va models - solutions, just say, strongly to the amateur. All of them are as much as possible, and therefore it remains to focus on the design and price. We can attribute ViewSonic XG3202-C and IIYAMA G-Master G3266HS to the most successful monitors, but be prepared to face the most "fatty" pixels and not the best viewing angles.
UFD (2560 × 1080)
This class of monitors is becoming less and less popular every year, but still there is still demand. Buyers concerns large "grain" and the limited choice. The most affordable representative of this family of game displays is his LG 34UC79G LG pioneer with AMD Freesync. The decision is not the fastest and trouble-free, so if possible, pay attention to the new and improved LG 34UC89G with NVIDIA G-Sync on board. It makes every sense to overpay for similar Acer Predator Z35 and Dell Alienware AW3418HW No, except that you do not suit the appearance and quality of the trim "Korean".
A separate line should be noted the only representative of the 30-inch UFHD models - Acer Predator Z301CTBMIPHZX with the Tracking Tracking Function Tobii Eye Tracker, but without G-Sync. The model will be interesting primarily to those who are simply not suitable for 34-35-inch giants.
WQHD (2560 × 1440)
A gift to fans of the WQHD standard and fast gaming monitors relatively recently made the IIYAMA company with its G-Master GB2760QSU. The solution is sold for 30-32 thousand rubles, equipped with an already proven TN + FILM matrix and offers freesync support. If there is a kind of distrust of this brand, then all the same, but in another wrapper is ready to offer an old man of ASUS MG279Q, which has fallen in cheaper from the moment being released. The best, not only in the opinion of the author, is the Dell S2716DG with NVIDIA G-Sync support and ULMB mode of backlighting - for advanced players with powerful PCs based on the GPU GPU series, this is perhaps the best choice. We would give preference to similar 23.8-inch WQHD models. We would not: On the screen everything will be fine and the need to activate not the most trouble-free Windows scaling system.
Solutions on * VA will provide greater image stability on the screen, the best viewing angles and often (but not always) the uniformity of the backlight is characteristic of this panels with a deep black field. At the same time, SAMSUNG C27HG70QQI is the best and optimal solution in a mill of 27-inch monitors. It will not conquer you the same response speed as Options on TN + Film, and some may tense the features of the fonts, but, nevertheless, will provide a completely different user experience for which they leave from TN.
Now go to 27-inch IPS. Here, continues to edit the Acer Predator XB271Hub point - an unconditional segment leader thanks to the competent price policy of the company and quality stability over the past 2 years. The monitor will delight not only an excellent color reproduction and a stable picture, but also a very high panel speed. Those who do not suit the appearance of the Acer model can safely look at its main and more expensive competitor ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q. It does not have any significant benefits, just another - more modern and stylish - design.
To pretty high-quality WQHD-displays with a 31.5-32-inches screen diagonal, you can include AOC AG322QCX and Samsung C32HG70QQI (the first released monitor in this segment). Alternative to them are LG novelties: tested LG 32GK850G browsers with NVIDIA G-Sync and only represented by 32GK850F with AMD Freesync 2 and pseudo-HDR. Another important difference between both models from AOC and Samsung solutions is a flat matrix with a less problematic running of fonts and small elements.
UWQHD (3440 × 1440)
If you are not fundamental support for NVIDIA G-SYNC, then acquaintance with the class of quick UWQHD displays can be started with excellent SAMSUNG solutions, tested by time: C34F791WQI and C34H890WJI. Models slightly differ at the price used by the matrix (* VA 1500R C QD-LED backlight and * VA 1800R C W-LED) and design. It is easy to make a choice: if it is not frightening unusual saturated / juicy colors and a larger bend radius, then the model with QD-LED will be the best choice.
The following level is IPS solutions with a vertical sweep frequency of 100 Hz. Here you should choose from Acer Predator X34P and Dell Alienware AW3418DW. These manufacturers have a different warranty policy (Dell in case of marriage comes the courier immediately with a new instance), the appearance is very different, poor factory setting, but the Acer is easy to change it for the better without complete calibration. The built-in acoustic system at the Alienware monitor is unlikely to become a determining factor, but the quality of the manufacture and rigor of a competitor can put the fat point in the question.
UHD 4K (3860 × 2160)
To 4k-models with a high frequency of vertical sweep can be treated differently. Some waited for them as Manna Heavenly, others are considered (and performance tests confirm this) that there is no point in them and will not be as long as the manufacturers of the GPU will not raise the speed plank of their graphic solutions 2-3 times from the current indicators.
At the time of preparation of this material, the selection of fast 4k-models SCUDEN and is represented by two 27-inch monitors with a frequency of 144 Hz: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and Acer Predator X27. The principal difference between them was not (if not considered the design, materials used and the external lighting systems), the possibilities of them are identical, but the price is very different: Acer's solution is almost 50 thousand rubles cheaper. It is possible that soon the difference will not be so significant, but it will have to choose anyway on the basis of sympathy to one or another brand or in appearance. It remains to accumulate 180-220 thousand rubles, pre-acquire PCs of no less cost.
В Other decisions Our leadership performs Samsung's models - the only one among actually sold with a resolution of 3840 × 1080. Despite the release of more affordable and, unfortunately, a technically simplified solution of C49J890DKI, a pioneer in a new segment for desktop monitors market is optimal and relevant - Samsung C49HG90DMI. Some are afraid of his sizes, others strains the "bold" pixel, but if you do not feel about these two categories of buyers, then you should not disappoint you this display.
A completely new 43-inch model with increased up to 3840 × 1200 pixels, respectively, a greater density of pixels should appear on the store shelves. The matrix of this model is * Va-type with the maximum sweep frequency of 120 Hz, supporting one of the adaptive synchronization systems is not presented. Relying on experience with 49-inch devices, it can be assumed that there should be no critical flaws from Samsung C43JW89, and competitors will not appear for a long time.
Choose a game monitor is not at all the same thing that choose a new motherboard, RAM, cooler, video card or even a photo / camcorder. It will not be insufficiently examined by technical specifications and colorful pictures on the Internet. It is difficult to determine and be sure of your choice for many will be difficult, and if there is no work experience for different in the class and level of models, then without going to the offline store, it will be possible and not possible. Not everyone can buy a "cat in a bag", both from a financial point of view (suddenly there will be no opportunity to return the incomprehensible goods) and from the standpoint of time costs.
On average, the new monitor is bought for the next 5-7 years of service, and many would like to make the most correct choice. Making it, based exclusively on feedback and tips on the part, will be a mistake, since there is a lot of variables depending on your individual features (for example, visual acuity), preferences and working conditions.
A large advantage of the full-fledged game solutions segment is a relatively small number of models, which will make it easier to find and quickly exclude from the list of unsuitable options. You do not have to sort out among the pairs of hundreds available on sale of displays, which will save your time and nervous cells will save, and the above tips will save, we hope to become a good assistant in solving the task in a short time.
The second day is trying to fill in the game Boss. And so he, the crucial moment: the countless attempt, the last fierce blow on the keyboard, meager XP and ... twitching the picture, sticks out the frame, loop, missed, Game Over. Maybe it's time to finally put a normal playing monitor with a smooth and clear dynamics, a lightning response and high-quality picture?
What is the game monitor different from the office?
In both types of monitors, the main goal is one - output of the image created by the graphics chip. The difference lies in the speed of frames, as well as in their quality and quantity. Office monitors have a frame update frequency from 60 to 75 Hz. This means that the gamer will see only up to 75 frames per second, that for dynamic games too little - the image will be not smooth enough for high-quality and comfortable gemina.
Moreover, if the monitor frequency does not reach the frame rate per second in the game, there may be visual artifacts in dynamic scenes. This is due to the fact that the monitor is trying to bring the following image before finished the processing of the previous one. Of course, it is possible to solve the problem by activating vertical synchronization in games. This feature reduces the number of frames per second to the monitor update frequency. However, in this case, you donate some aspects of the management, since many important mechanics in the games are tied to the personnel indicator per second - in PUBG, for example, the higher the frame rate, the higher the shooting rate of the weapon.
Also, the response time also plays an important role. Office monitors have a delay from 5 to 14 ms - so much time need a pixel for color change. For dynamic games, it is too slow, and therefore the player may have difficulty management.
Game monitors were created to solve all these problems. They have a frame update frequency from 60 to 240 Hz, and the response time is up to 1 millisecond.
Diagonal, resolution and aspect ratio
Large and small, almost square or elongated, curved and straight - which monitor is better?
Starting with 24 inches. It is possible less, but then all the details of the spaceface in the game will be small and not such epic. The monitor is 24 inches in moderation compact, the place takes a bit, but most importantly - you fully cover the screen with a straight look. You do not have to turn your head to look at a certain corner of the screen. This will be useful in particularly dynamic games where the frame changes instantly, and the outcome directly depends on your reaction. The screen resolution with such a diagonal should be no lower than 1920x1080p (Full HD) is the minimum value in which you will not rush pixels in the eyes.
If you want the maximum immersion in the game, pay attention to the model more. Currently, game monitors are available with a diagonal up to 49 inches - depends on how much space you have and how much money you are willing to spend on a cool screen. By choosing a large monitor, you can get a whole home theater, where movements head for the review will only add realistic. This decision is perfect for single or casual network games. But if you sit in front of such a monitor at the distance of the table and play the shooter, maybe the head is sprinkled. For a large diagonal, the permission is also required - from 2k or higher. Note that with increasing permission, the requirements for the computer's gland increases.
What about proportions? Everything is simple here. The most common aspect ratio is 16: 9. This format is most often used in games and films. With this aspect ratio there will be no problems with the optimization of the picture.
But Ultrawide monitors with the aspect ratio of 21: 9 are, of course, it looks epic, but not suitable for everyone. On the one hand, on the ultrasound monitor in the games a significantly wider angle of the review. It can also be very convenient for working in several windows mode, in audio and video editors. But, at the same time, not all games and films are optimized for ultrashirome permission.
Curved screen is a super immersion in virtual reality. But this chip is mostly only for one user. To perceive the entire picture without distortion, you need to sit strictly centered. Accordingly, the fans of multiplayers or viewing of cinema in the company will be quite uncomfortable.
Frame update frequency and number of frames per second
The number of frames per second (Next FPS) displays the overall performance of the computer in games. It's no secret that for gamers this indicator should be stable and high, but why? As you already know, some game mechanics are tied to the FPS indicator, and if there are 60 frames per second for a comfortable game in single or multiplayer projects, then in dynamic competitive disciplines, there is no adequate number of frames - the more, the better. And so that the image was as smooth and without any artifacts, professional players use monitors with an increased frame upgrade frequency. This indicator displays the number of images that the matrix is able to withdraw in one second. Modern game monitors are capable of working at frequencies up to 240 Hz, so that you have an advantage in speed and smoothness.
If you dream of breaking all in cybersport, then a better monitor with a renewal frequency of 120 Hz and above. It should be borne in mind that the advantages of the game monitor are disclosed only if your computer is able to produce a steadily high number of frames. And so that the image does not entail the ruptures of frames or delays in control, it is recommended to use G-SYNC from NVIDIA or Freesync from AMD. These technologies are designed to save you from the above problems, forcibly synchronizing the frequency of the video card output to the monitor update frequency without any delays.
Response time - the time required by the pixel to change the color, and this parameter is also very important in choosing a monitor. Most conventional monitors are required from 5 to 14 milliseconds to go to a new color. This indicator is acceptable in work, but in games you can notice the blurring of the image.
For single games, it can also be 5-7 ms enough, but 1 ms minimizes any delays in the drawing of dynamic objects. But in an effort to lightning speed, you will have to make a compromise - the response time directly depends on the type of matrix used.
How to choose the type of matrix and coating
Monitors use three types of matrices: TN, MVA / VA or IPS.
If you are a big fan of competitive projects, and the monitor is required only for efficient gemina - the TN matrix is preferred. Only it guarantees the actual response time to 1 ms. At the same time, monitors with a frequency of refreshments of 240 Hz and TN matrix are more affordable by price than on IPS. But there are nuances: mediocre color reproduction and somewhat inferior to other matrices of viewing angles
MVA or VA is an intermediate solution between TN and IPS. In comparison with TN, VA has excellent viewing angles, contrast, uniformity of the illumination and high-quality color rendering. But the response time rises - from 4 ms. In addition, very few models on a VA matrix with an update frequency over 144 Hz.
IPS matrices have ideal viewing angles and color reproduction, it is comfortable to work for it, view and process photos, watch movies. But to sacrifice will have increased response time and low update frequency in comparison with other types of matrices - mostly up to 144 Hz.
Matte and glossy screen coverage? The matte screen will greatly absorbs the falling light, does not glare in the sun or under the lamp. But slightly loses gloss in brightness and contrast. The gloss looks good, in brightness does not lose, but he brings the light.
What to look first
A good monitor will solve your tasks and serves 5-7 years. When buying a new monitor, refine the features of the computer: processor and video card. In order not to overpay for excess power and spend time replacing the monitor, consult our experts. This can be done in the "Question-answer" section on the page you like.
Usually, the more diagonal, the more expensive the monitor. 21-22 inches are suitable only for the simplest tasks, such as mail checks. To work with texts, tables and surfing on the Internet, a diagonal of 23-24 inches is more suitable. Such models are usually inexpensive, about 8,000 rubles. To play and work with images, choose a diagonal from 27 inches.
Choose a bigger diagonal if you have bad vision or you sit far from the monitor.
Choose in Catalog
The most common format. Suitable for surfing on the Internet, working with images, games, watching movies, YouTube, Twitch.Go to the catalog
Outdated format. Only to work with documents.Go to the catalog
Suitable for working with images, watching movies in widescreen format and games.Go to the catalog
The superwatch monitor combines two full-fledged screen 27 inches. Need to work with a large amount of data.
To prepare contracts, maintain accounting, surfing on the Internet.
Universal solution for simple games, working with texts, creating presentations, watching movies, easy work with photos and videos.
- 2560x1440 (2K)
Intermediate between Full HD and 4K formats. Popular among gamers, movie lovers and those who work professionally with graphics.
For games, professional photo processing, working with illustrations for books and magazines. On this screen, you can consider the smallest details.
Choose in Catalog
Type of matrix
The matrix is the basis of the screen, the brightness, contrast, the response time of the pixel and the realism of the color rendering are dependent on its type.
TN (TN + FILM)
The best option, mainly to work with text, code, can be used as a second screen. Not suitable for working with images and multimedia due to low quality color rendering, low contrast and brightness, poor viewing angle. Distorts the picture, if you look at her at an angle. Of the advantages - the lowest response time, so the TN matrix meets in game models with a frequency of update from 144 Hz and above.
- Working with code and text
- Working with images
- Not dynamic games
Good quality color reproduction and brightness, wide viewing angles, no distortion when watching a picture at an angle. Relatively high cost and not very fast response. Suitable for home and office use, for not dynamic games and work with images.
VA (MVA, PVA)
- Working with code and text
- Working with images and video
- Suitable for gamers
Alternative to the main types of matrices. Smooth gear, gradients, image quality and viewing angle better than TN, contrast, response time is better than IPS. Often found in game monitors.
Choose in Catalog
Brightness and contrast
The higher this indicator, the more clear the image will be in the light of light, both solar and lighting devices. Brightness is important if:
- Planning to put the monitor in a well-lit room or opposite the window in which the sun shines.
- Work in a small, poorly lit office.
- Going to using a monitor for professional work with graphics and video.
Brightness of 300 cd / m 2It is usually enough to work in a very bright room. For game models, choose the brightness of 250 kD / m 2.
This is the ratio of brightness of the darkest darkest point itself on the screen. On monitors with high contrast, black color is really black, and white is clean, not dull. Usually for comfortable use of the monitor, it is enough to a 1: 500 contrast, for playing and professional work you need a contrast of 1: 1000 and higher.
If you are sitting before this screen exactly through its center, then the distance from any point to the eye will be the same. Due to this, the picture on the edges does not seem distorted, the image becomes more realistic, the effect of presence and full immersion in what is happening before your eyes. This is especially noticeable on monitors with a diagonal of 32 inches and above.
Monitors with curved screens, as a rule, buy for the game, rarely for work. Watch movies, especially the company, are inconvenient on them - if you are not sitting in the center, the picture will be distorted.Go to the catalog
Disputes on the quality of components in the game party are not stopped for a second. Some are measured by the volume of video memory, others are parhed the frequency of the processor, the third with each convenient case will be mentioned by SSD to terabyte, RGB-backlight in its system unit, a pleasant mechanical keyboard clatter and the trump card 16000 dpi at the mouse for distribution of the Hadshot. In rare cases, the queue comes to discussion of monitors. And completely in vain. The monitor in this bundle is an eternally undervalued mediator who rarely get laurels, although he is worthy of their no less than his colleagues.
The choice of the monitor is a responsible step, to approach which it is also worth the assembly of components. Incorrect selection of the output device can novel the power of the configuration due to lack of ability to realize the potential of the equipment. So that you do not have failed, and the system has revealed to full, we together with professionals from the hypermarket for gamers of CSOs! And in collaboration with AOC prepared instructions for you on choosing a game monitor.
Epoch left, when 17 inches were the norm for the gaming industry. Today you do not need to hide the imperfection of graphics for small screens. The optimal selection of the playing monitor in 2019 ranges from 24 to 27 inches.
The monitors of this format are comfortable for the average game of the gamer, whose screen is located before your eyes. If you need a monitor over 27 inches, do not forget that a large diagonal requires a larger distance. Otherwise, it will have to constantly run through the eyes, which gives discomfort. We also recommend choosing monitors with a diagonal from 24 to 27 inches lovers of games with a view from a third party, like GTA 5, Pubg or World of Tanks due to the comfortable scaling of objects on the screen.
The monitor resolution is responsible for the clarity of the picture. The higher the pixel density, the easier it is to see the details of the equipment in some of the Division. Standard permission for most game monitors today is 1920x1080 or Full HD. However, with an increase in the diagonal, the inevitable "purge" of the picture increases. If you have a powerful video card, we recommend monitors with a resolution of 2560x1440 or Quad HD.
Pixel density will increase significantly, and the detail improves. Consider an option with a resolution of 3840x2160 or 4K today makes sense if you are the owner of the top configuration and you have an unlimited budget. Such monitors are pretty, and the content honestly would use 4k, little.
Type of matrix
We reached the first category, where the first serious reflections begin before buying. Matrices of most modern monitors are divided into three types: TN, IPS and MVA / VA.
The most ancient and common type of matrix today. It differs in the measure of a contrast picture and a small response time among colleagues. The perfect option with a moderately limited budget and love for network shooters.
The reference of the color reproduction, contrast and angle view of the matrix, which can often be found on the tables from illustrators or photographers. Less often - on the tables of gamers due to high cost.
MVA / VA matrix
Middle between TN and IPS. From TN, the matrix got a high response speed and a reasonable price, from IPS - color reproduction, contrast and wide viewing angles. A decent choice if you are looking for games first of all bright colors.
Run any shooter and quickly negate the mouse from the side to the side. Noticed a train? It is this loophole that reduces the number of frags. The loop occurs in the case of a high response time of the monitor. On average, the indicator acceptable for games varies in the area of 5 ms. Monitors with this response time are suitable for games where the accuracy and speed of reactions are not important. However, if you are configured to conquer the tournament tables in CS: Go or Overwatch, then your choice is monitors with a response time of 1 ms.
Another archiving for the monitor is a parameter that is able to radically transform the gaming experience. The screen update frequency shows how many times the monitor redraws and gives the image in one second. In games, the effect is expressed in the smoothness of what is happening on the screen.
It is important to note that the update frequency indicator is directly related to the maximum amount of FPS in games. For example, a monitor with a frequency of update 60 Hz will never give more than 60 FPS, which strongly limits the potential of the system. For game monitors, 144 Hz is considered an average of 144 Hz, which can be comfortable to play any modern single and network games. We recommend the monitor with a frequency above 144 Hz. We recommend those who aims on a career in cybersport.
G-Sync and Freesync
Technologies created in NVIDIA and AMD subsoils change the update rate depending on the rendering speed of frames. Visually, we get a smoother picture without image breaks at a rendering rate of 30 - 60 frames per second or lower. For work requires an appropriate manufacturer's video card.
There are two types of coverage: glossy and matte. The glossy possesses saturated colors and provides high-quality color reproduction, but greatly brings the light and reflects everything in itself in the mirror. The matte coating is less saturated, but with an anti-reflective coating, which eliminates the solar "bunnies" and reflections.
Game monitors in 2019 are equipped with HDMI and DisplayPort. The first has a limit on the update frequency of 144 Hz, the second allows you to squeeze a maximum of your system.
As a rule, game monitors over 144 Hz a priori are equipped with DisplayPort. Please note that your video card must support this connection interface.
Theory in practice
We are together with a hypermarket for gamers wow! And AOC has prepared a selection of game monitors for you, each of which is the optimal solution for its price segment.
Basic game monitors
Models Aoc G2460PF. иAoc G2590FX. They are game initial level monitors that are suitable for unassuming battles in the network and single occasions. The diagonal of 24 and 25 inches with a base resolution of 1920x1080 will provide a wide review, and the update frequency 144 Hz is associated with a response time 1 ms - smooth picture without delays and a loop, which guarantees a comfortable distribution of headshots in CS: GO.
Advanced gaming monitors
Models Aoc G2790px и AOC C27G1 At first glance, they rush into their eyes. Diagonal 27 inches with a basic resolution of 1920x1080 will like fans of games from a third party and will allow to notice the tank opponent from afar. The models have a frequency of update 144 Hz and a response time of 1 ms, which is comfortable for the networking of the semi-professional level. Separate mention Availability Curved screen AOC C27G1, Thanks to which the maximum immersion in the gameplay is ensured.
Professional gaming monitors
Let's start a ruler with monitors for future and existing cybersports: AOC AG251FZ. и AOC AG251FG. . Regarding the diagonal and permission, everything is rather standard - 24 and 25 inches and 1920x1080. But the attitude is changing when it comes to update frequency. Staten 240 Hz and response time 1 ms allow you to literally live in the game. Is it worth saying what an advantage it gives in network battles.
Models AOC AGON AG241QX и AOC AG241QG. Another case. With a regular diagonal of 24 inches, they have a resolution of 2560x1440, which automatically improves the quality of the detail of the picture on the screen. The monitors will perfectly show themselves in single games with a bet on the worked world, as well as in network projects - the frequency of the screen update 144 Hz and 165 Hz to the Type with a response time of 1 ms they speak for themselves.
When choosing a playing monitor, it is important to ask yourself a few questions: for which games I need it, what I am willing to donate and how much is willing to pay. Speed and smoothness are important - see the models with a high frequency of the screen update. Detailing is important - pay attention to the resolution. And, of course, do not forget about the competent selection of other components, because the stable system is the key to the gaming longevity. * We hope that this guide was useful and help choose a monitor that will reveal your system to full.
This material is written by the site visitor, and for it is accruedRemuneration
Many users of the monitor choose are extremely irresponsible, paying focusing and budget only to the computer itself. It is strange, because high-quality game devices, including the monitor, make the gameplay much more comfortable, and sometimes more efficiently. In this material, we will analyze many important aspects of game monitors and will try to help you in the right choice.
What is the difference between the game monitor from the office?
In both types of monitors, the main goal is one - output of the image created by the graphics chip. The difference lies in the speed of frames, as well as in their quality and quantity. Unlike office, gaming monitors have a significantly lower response time and a higher frame update frequency. In this regard, the change of images occurs somewhat faster, which creates an advantage in speed and smoothness.
Announcements and advertising
Mass arrival RTX 3080 - piles of boards
<b> Mass reducing prices for all </ b> RTX 3070 in Citylink
Overcome RTX 3060 deficiency - see prices
Many RTX 6700XT went on sale
75 "LG IPS for 4 352 000r - see the characteristics
4000r Discount on 1TB SSD in Regard
RTX 3060 has become just more expensive than 2060
At the same time, any game peripherals do not give explicit advantages over other players. Such devices only create more comfortable conditions to make your gameplay more enjoyable, and only from part more efficient.
What diagonal, resolution and aspect ratio are optimal?
Currently, game monitors are available with a diagonal of 21 to 27 inches. Objectively better size matrix is not - all subjectively. The most popular choice both among ordinary users and professional players is a diagonal of a size of 24 inches. The resolution of the monitor should be no lower than 1920x1080 pixels - it is this indicator that will be optimal and most affordable. Also on the market, models with Quad HD and even Ultra HD resolution are available, but you must remember that the load on the computer increases with increasing permission.
The most popular and universal aspect ratio - 16: 9. It is suitable for both games and surfing on the Internet. What you can not say about ultrawide monitors with the aspect ratio of 21: 9. Ultrashiroy monitors are perfect for games, as they significantly increase the viewing angle in games. However, any other scenario of use will be very uncomfortable due to the low height of the display or large useless frames on the sides. The selection of the display format depends only on its own preferences. Remember that Ultrawide monitors with the same display diagonal significantly longer than standard 16: 9 options.
Frame update frequency in the game monitor
The frame update frequency is the most important parameter in choosing a gaming monitor. It displays the maximum possible number of image changes per second. Office monitors have a frequency of upgrade from 60 to 75 Hertz. With this indicator, you will not notice the visual differences between 80 and 150 FPS, since the monitor is physically not able to withdraw more than 60 or 75 images per second. Moreover, if frame performance in a second is significantly superior to the screenshot frequency, visual frame breaks can be observed. This is due to the fact that the monitor begins to output the next frame before the previous one ended.
Game matrices have a refresh rate from 120 to 240 hertz. In this case, in a second you see no longer standard 60 frames, but all 120, 144 or 240 frames. The image on the playing monitor is updated faster and significantly more smoothly, which has a positive effect on the quality and level of the game.
The advantages of the game monitor are disclosed only if your computer is able to stably produce the required number of frames per second - the FPS indicator in the games should be not lower than the frame update frequency at the monitor.
What should be the response time in the playing monitor?
Response time - the time required by the pixel to change the color. This parameter is also very important in choosing a monitor. Most of the usual monitors are required from 5 milliseconds to go to a new color. This indicator is acceptable, but in the most dynamic games you can notice the blurring of the image.
Pixels in many gaming monitors for color change are required only 1 millisecond, which is why any delays in the drawing of dynamic objects are minimized. But those who want to acquire a monitor with minimal delays will have to make a compromise - often the response time directly depends on the type of matrix used.
How to choose the type of matrix and coating?
At the moment, three types of matrices are used in game monitors: TN, MVA / VA or IPS. The best choice is the TN matrix exclusively for games. It has the most minimal response time - 1 millisecond, is able to work at the frame update frequency over 200 hertz and is quite cheap costs in production, which affects the ultimate cost. The minuses of this matrix are low brightness and mediocre color reproduction. This type is suitable only to active gamers or professional players.
The following type - MVA or VA is an intermediate solution between TN and IPS. In comparison with TN, these matrices have excellent viewing angles and high-quality color reproduction. The response time is also higher - from 4 milliseconds. It may negatively affect games with a very dynamic gameplay. The cost of MVA / VA is somewhat higher, but still cheaper IPS. Such matrices will suit users using a computer not only for games, but also to work or view content.
IPS is the best and very expensive option. These matrices have perfect color reproduction, which will allow you to comfortably work with image processing even on the playing monitor. In addition, IPS has the highest contrast rates, viewing angles and brightness among other competitors. Of the minuses, you can select the response time - 4-5 milliseconds, as well as the highest cost. If you are considering the purchase of a gaming monitor as the main and plan to use the computer not only in games - it is worth paying attention to the first to IPS matrices.
There are also two types of matrix coating: matte and glossy. The first option is endowed with anti-reflective coating, which eliminates sunlights falling on the display in the bright time of the day. The second option exceeds bright and saturated colors. Thus, the choice of coating is to approach in advance, deciding with the location of the monitor.
According to statistics, users buy monitors every 6-7 years, because the choice of a new device should be extremely responsible. From your choice will depend on the further experience of interaction with the computer and your health. We hope this material will help you make the right choice.
This material is written by the site visitor, and for it is accruedRemuneration
Finally, by collecting the full amount to buy a game configuration, many gladly exhale - the monitor, keyboard and other hardships will no longer require high costs. The manner exhales and ... is mistaken. The monitor, worthy of the top configuration, will also fly into a penny to its owner. Is it worth buying a real gaming celant for a round sum or can be limited to an inheritance from the old configuration? We will understand the details.
Oldfagi well remember those times when the monitor was bought together with the system unit, keyboard, mouse and speakers. An adult audience will surely remember this chimeura on a working PC in the office or at home, a smaller - computer purchased by parents exclusively "for study." In those days, it was not taken at all to think over the frequency and resolution of the screen. The gamers who kill the clock for third heroes or some kind of kwweik was not to the frequency of frames and the response time - they were guided by the principle of "good comp, nothing slows down." Under the "good computer" it was implied by the absence of absolutely explicit sections of the FPS. In those days, no one has not measured them, what to say about the response time of the monitor.
But, as Starina Snake once said, "War Has Changed" And now on the fields of multiplayer (and singles) battles in account, there are some "MS" in time between the click and displaying the action on the screen. Yes, the number of RAM, the video card and a powerful processor, as they say, are "deciding", but from the monitor it began to depend much more than ten years ago.
It is the quality of the picture, and, as it were, it is trite and clumsy there may sound, eye safety. Here, rather, it is not generally harmful to the flickering of the screen, but the influence of various levels of technology on this indicator. A familiar situation for many, the circumstances were forced to sit at the old PC with the "Box" monitor (Elt Monitor), after half an hour, her eyes climbed onto the forehead. Yes, and the frag hang, especially the player in some top league, it will be problematic if the gameplay is perceived with a small, but delay.
The main characteristics of the Gamer monitor
Now the iron market does not suffer - of course, the crisis is a little darkens the picture, but it is rather for the buyer, there are still dozens of new products on the shop windows. About online shopping stores, one Amazon is worth it. In the ocean of the range it is very easy to get lost, the sales consultant will likely try to sell you the most expensive model, Comuniti on Amazon - the most "average" price and quality ratio. Let's try to figure out the main characteristics of the monitors and their properties, in order not to regret the moneystarly spent money.
Perhaps the very first factor to pay attention to both buyers and manufacturers. The size of the screen directly affects both its attractiveness for the gameimer and the cost of production for the company's company. For gamers, you can define several basic diagonals:
The mass audience chooses a diagonal of 24-27 inches. If you want exotic, then forward - 30-inch monitor to help. But it is worth considering that Eyes trite unable to embrace such a screen width , Therefore, about 20% of the space will remain useless. The manufacturer for every inches increases, so the choice is not the most profitable. As a way out of the situation - Models with a curved display . Curved as much as in order to cover the maximum space visible to the eye.
Screen resolution and proportion
The second screens size indicator responsible for Number of pixels in the image . Chief Principle - More is better. But it is worth considering the complete dependence of the performance level from the prescribed permission.
The main formation of all modern media products is projected by the ratio of the parties 16: 9, which came to replace outdated 4: 3. This is a classic "rectangular" format, familiar to each modern user, perhaps the most relevant and most popular of all present in the market. Allows you to comfortably view movies without black strips on the borders of the screen. Monitor 16:10 will be slightly higher than the predecessor and is more suitable for working with office applications and media actors.
As for permission, everything is much more transparent:
It will not require high costs from iron, but the entire potential of modern graphics will not reveal.
- Full HD - 1920x1080 pixels
Standardly high demand for the gland at the maximum twisted graph, and, accordingly, a high level of the most "grapony".
- Ultra HD or 4K -2560x1440 \ 3840x2160 pixels
The youngest standard from the presented. This standard is no longer a boric luxury, but remains a representative of the premium segment. A number of top games already gives you the opportunity to enjoy the game in 4k. For example, in Watch Dog 2, the screen of the game mobile phone looks clearer than mine in life. Yes, and YouTube is the same for a long time ready to twist the cats in UHD - the reason to think about it.
Basic monitor parameters depend on the type of matrix:
The quality of the transmitted colors and their "reality" in accordance with these counterparts. This parameter is especially important for working with photos and videos, but in the case of the games, we will not forget it either. Every year the schedule becomes more realistic, and therefore the number of colors and shades is increasing. And on a 10-year-old pressure monitor, the fresh Battlefield will look not very "fresh."
The time for which the image point changes in brightness - usually it is 2-5 ms. Little than 6ms segment is fraught with lubricants in dynamic scenes.
Here everything is clear - the ratio of the brightness of the bright point of the screen to the darkest.
The minimum distance at which various "artifacts" on the screen becomes noticeable.
Without going into long technical descriptions - a table with the basic characteristics of various types of matrices.
Type of matrix
MVA \ PVA.
Level of color reproduction
An indicator responsible for the number of frames per second is called FPS. It is displayed manually in the game settings. The stable gaming "classic" was considered 60 frames per second at a frequency of 60 Hz, respectively. But, like any game iron, gamers monitors a few steps ahead, and therefore The norm is considered 120 -144 Hz . Such iron allows you to display the most dynamic scenes are more realistic than 60 Hz. The price of increasing frequency is also growing, and there will be little without a powerful video card from 144 Hz monitor.
The quality of the resulting image depends not only on the matrix installed in the monitor, but also from the video connector. The presence of an additional video connector will provide you with the ability to connect the second source of the image - whether it is a laptop or TV. In modern monitors, you can find the following video connections (both individually and somewhat immediately):
A digital connector that allows you to connect modern audio and video equipment, as well as laptops to image output devices. The main advantage is the transfer of audio tracks by one cable with a video stream.
Digital connector, the most "progressive" from those presented. Provides ample opportunities for transmitting sound, surpassing a popular DVI. It is expensive, it is quite common. If you really think about buying a monitor with such a connector, then only for the long-term perspective. It is worth considering that the fact that the old type display does not support HDR.
Analog connectors characteristic of television monitors with built-in TV tules. In addition, it allows you to connect outdated audio and video equipment like cassette players.
Top 10 best game monitors
Below will be presented, according to our edition, monitors that can find gamer in the spring of 2017. We can only adjust your course and protect from very useless purchases. But you will have to choose the most suitable anyway - guided by personal preferences and financial condition.
We will present you well, very cool monitors, which due to today's price can not yet become a massive product, but are the embodiment of the Gamer's Dream.
Best Curved Gaming Monitor - Alienware AW3420DW 34 "
Large and smart monitor from Dell game line. It is not distinguished by the most common aspect ratio: 9: 9 Instead of standard 16: 9 gives a cool cinema effect, which you will not get with the usual monitor. The device maintains a 120 Hz update frequency and NVIDIA G-SYNC branded technology, so the picture is very smooth and really alive. With flowers, too, a full order: the monitor provides 100% color coverage of SRGB. Wide viewing angles, curved shape and large stock in brightness complement the picture almost an ideal gaming device.
Of course, someone may not have enough permissions of 3440 per 1440 points, but nothing is better not to find anything better for 90,000 rubles.
Full HD 3440 x 1440
Update frequency 120 Hz
Response time 2 ms
Connectors: HDMI, USB Type A X4, USB Type B, DisplayPort 1.2, Audio Stereo
Price: ₽ 91 990
Best Monitor 144 Hz - Acer Nitro VG271USBMIIPX 27 "
A relatively inexpensive game monitor, the main chip of which is a hardware update frequency of 144 Hz. In combination with the support of AMD Freesync technology, it gives a smooth picture without lost frames at least in games, even in films. It is most useful. It will be in competitive action like CS: Go, where the pair of unnecessary FPS can be separated from the transformation of the player in someone's next frag.
Less than the above, everything is rather standard, but at the same time modern: Diagonal in 27 inches, resolution 2560x1440 pixels, support for HDR, IPS matrix with anti-reflective coating. For 30,000 rubles - the most for the fan of shooters.
Price: ₽ 30 480
Best PC Monitor - BenQ RL2755HM
All the same FULL HD, but already a more budget model from BenQ. It offers a little worse indicators, but for an acceptable amount - so, this model by 27 inches will cost approximately 14,990 thousand rubles. See for yourself:
From an interesting one you can mark a few details. First - technology Black Equalizer. , solving a problem too dark scenes in games: The brightness in them will be automatically adjusted. Also pleased technology Flicker-Free. which ensures the lack of flickering pictures at any brightness. AND RTS Mode. Designed for a comfortable game in themselves guess what genre. The design highlighted except for an unusual protruding leg-rack.
Price: ₽ 14 990
27 inches monitor - MSI OPTIX MAG27C 27 "
First we briefly go through the main characteristics of the model:
Full HD 1920 x 1080
Update frequency 144 Hz
Response time 1 ms
Connectors: DVI-D (HDCP), HDMI 1.4, DisplayPort 1.2, headphone output
The Taiwanese company MSI has not been successfully balanced on a fine face between quality, functional and price. And it goes, you need to say, not so bad. Judge for yourself: in just 23,500 rubles we offer a gaming 27-inch curved mold monitor with anti-reflective coating and a hardware update frequency of 144 Hz, bright LED illumination "Without flicker" and support for AMD freesync technology.
Yes, this is not the highest-tech device by the standards of 2020. For example, the resolution of the panel is only 1920 per 1080 pixels, and the time of the matrix response is completely standard 1 ms. But with such a price tag, pay attention to the minor flaws seems not quite fair.
Price: ₽ 21 990
Best Budget Monitor for Games - AOC E970SWN
The manufacturer gives the following description of the AOC E970SWN monitor:
AOC E970SWN 18.5-inch Led-Lit Monitor refers to very budget models, because its price is ~ 4.5 thousand rubles. Going in China. It can be attached to the wall, get on a comfortable sofa and, of course, enjoy the games.
The monitor displays 16.7 million shades. The brightness equals 200 cd / m2, which is enough for most games. The duration of the response of the monitor is 5 ms. Therefore, dynamic movements are reflected smoothly. A good option, for example, for football simulators, But not for shooters.
The usual monitor contrast is 700 K 1, dynamic - 20 million to 1, the brightness equals 200 cd / m2. The monitor has a HD resolution of 1366 by 768 pixels. A 19-inch diagonal is an average market indicator. The width refers to length as 16 to 9. It is also equipped with an economical regime and E-Saver: these options allow you to reduce the consumption of electricity.
Monitor Standard Design: The basis of the case is black plastic, and the display has a matte surface that does not reflect anything except sunlight.
Included with the device are:
The monitor has a built-in power supply. The maximum power of the latter is 15 w / h.
Perhaps the most significant drawback of the monitor is a small viewing angle. The horizontal indicator is only 90 degrees, vertically - 65. It is also not very pleased that this model has a primitive menu with limited setup capabilities. The English layout is performed well, Russian requires minor refinement.
The monitor well reflects the elements of 2D graphics, so it can be called a good choice not only for office staff, but also for gamers: A short response time, displaying a wide range of color gamut and an acceptable level of contrast It will fully provide you with the desired level of the game. In general, if you do not require a picture of too much, then a completely decent version of the monitor for gemina among itself is similar.
Price: ₽ 4790
Best Eye Monitor - Dell Computer UltraSharp U2415
Dell has once again pleased the fans of a clear image, releasing the 24-inch model UltraSharp U2415 in a modern curved style for ~ 21 thousand rubles. The format screen ratio is 16:10, which allows you to more comfortably do not only with office features, but also to view the video and play. For the most comfortable operation, the model is equipped with a matte IPS screen with LED (wised) illumination.
Despite the fact that the model U2415 has a narrow border of the screen at 6.9 mm, Frontal surface looks like a monolithic block without Borders. Only at the bottom of the screen can notice a small framing that gives this model sophistication and modern style. The bottom panel of the screen is the touch control buttons and the power icon.
When you first turn on the monitor, you can notice a good color reproduction, as the manufacturer performs factory calibration, which is attached to the special report. But, even despite the built-in function of automatic brightness and color calibration, you can notice a completely deep black color. This lack can be corrected by manual adjustment by opening the settings menu: brightness, contrast and sharpness. Manual adjustment significantly improves color depth. The viewing angles are quite acceptable to view images at a distance of 60-70 cm. At the same time, the larger the distance from the monitor to the eye is increasing, the more noticeable color reproduction defects. We also can't not mark No flicker, or PWM - These are almost all gamers using this monitor.
Particular attention should be paid to the universal stand, with which the monitor can be positioned most conveniently for the user. Stand allows you to tilt the monitor up, down and turn to the sides. In addition, the screen can be fixed on the rack at any height, which gives the maximum use of the monitor. These turns of the stand, as well as the absence of clearly visible borders on the screen, allow you to use two monitors at once set nearby to remove the common picture.
Of all the above, the following advantages of the Ultrasharp U2415 model can be distinguished:
Decent color reproduction;
Convenient adjustment of the universal stand;
the possibility of rotation of the screen in the portrait position;
The presence of four digital inputs.
Price: ₽ 21490
27-inch game monitor - ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM
Tell me, what could be better for games than a 144 hertz monitor? Only a monitor on 280 hertz! For any games and, of course, the films of this frequency are enough for the eyes: here the most important thing is that the video card will pull such FPS, and the monitor will definitely fail. Moreover, it also supports G-SYNC from NVIDIA, and Freesync from AMD, so there will be no problems with compatibility with a video card. High brightness of 400 cd / m2 and high-quality anti-reflective coating allow you to use the monitor even on a sunny day - the image does not fade and does not fade. There is a uniform illumination without flickering and support for HDR.
The resolution of the matrix, however, not 4k, but the usual FullHD (1920 per 1080 pixels). Otherwise, no shortcomings are not found here. Moreover, at the price of 33,000 rubles.
FullHD 1920 x 1080
Update frequency 280 Hz
Response time 1 ms
Connectors: HDMI 2.0 x2, DisplayPort 1.2, headphone output
Price: ₽ 31 480
Budget Monitor - AOC G2260VWQ6 21.5 "
The budget game monitor for which is asked about 7,500 rubles. Of course, it would be strange to wait for something incredible from the device for that kind of money. Nevertheless, the AOS apparatus turned out very interesting. The TN-matrix is pretty smart, albeit with not the largest viewing angles. The resolution of 1920 on 1080 pixels, an update rate of 76 Hz, support for AMD freesync, 250 cd / m2 brightness - all parameters are quite at the level, even if records do not beat. Is that a diagonal of 21.5 inches to most players will seem too modest. On the other hand, for someone compact dimensions, perhaps will become only a plus.
A worthy choice for economical gamer in a limited space.
Price: ₽ 8 240
Top 4K Monitors
We decided to separately allocate the best Gamers monitors with a resolution of 4K (or Ultra HD). We present you 2 models: one more mass, and the second is suitable for those gamers, which agrees only to the best picture.
Game Monitor - ASUS MG28UQ 28 "
We study the main characteristics:
UHD 3840 x 2160
Update frequency 60 Hz
Response time 1 ms
Connectors: HDMI X3, DisplayPort, headphone output, USB Type A x3, USB Type B
This device is a direct confirmation that the gaming 4k monitor does not have to be exorbitantly expensive. Ultrahd gradually becomes industrial standard, and the devices with its support slowly occupy not only the upper, but also the average price segment. Here is a 28-inch MG28UQ without a discount worth only a little more than 28,000 rubles. At the same time, the device gives a picture with a resolution of 3840 per 2160 pixels with brightness of 330 kD / m2 and an update frequency of 60 Hz.
The matrix, unfortunately, is far from the most modern, TN - with rather modest viewing angles, albeit with high-quality wised illumination without flicker, fast response and support for AMD Freesync.
A worthy opportunity to try 4k and at the same time not to break.
Price: ₽ 26 955
28 inches monitor - samsung u28e590d
Representative UHD. (or 4k) at a higher price than other monitors in our top (~ 15690 thousand rubles), and more acceptable indicators for the game - a response to 1 ms and 60 Hz updates are very smoothly, largely due to Freesync. From AMD, more high quality (sharpened under 4k) analogue of GSync.
UHD. 3840 x 2160.
Update frequency 60 Hz
Response time 1 ms.
Connectors: HDMI, DP, DVI
From noteworthy - Eye Saver mode that for such a diagonal is important. As a result, we have an excellent choice from the category 4K, which is suitable for online battles without suffering in the response.
Price: ₽ 16 990
Best 2K Monitor - IIYAMA G-Master GB2730QSU-B1 27 "
- 27 inches
- Update frequency 75 Hz
- Response time 1 ms
- Connectors: DVI-D (HDCP), HDMI, DisplayPort, audio stereo input, headphone output, USB Type A x2, USB Type B
- Built-in speakers
4k, of course, an excellent standard is one who penetrates ultra-highly clarity, hardly wants to change it for something else. That's just to pull top modern games in this resolution, you need top modern video cards that there are few people. And here it comes to the aid compromise 2K, 2560 per 1440 points - resolution, lower UltraHD with its 3840 per 2160 pixels, but higher than Full HD since 1920 per 1080. The most important thing is that with a rather sharp and detailed picture, the monitor is relatively cheap, And Iron PC does not work for wear. In addition, the device looks pretty, gives a bright and contrast picture, even if the TN matrix expects wide viewing angles or a saturated black color from it.
Perhaps the only thing that can be complained here - a very sad sound from the built-in speakers. But waiting for something else from the monitor for 19,000 rubles it would be already excess.
Price: ₽ 21 107
Comparative Table of Gaming Monitors
|Name||Important characteristics||Price||Rating Editor|
|ALIENWARE AW3420DW.||34 inches, curved screen, update frequency 120 Hz, aspect ratio: 21: 9||₽ 91 990.|
|Acer Nitro VG271USBMIIPX.||Frequency of update 144 Hz, built-in speakers, response time 1 ms, 27 inches.||₽ 30 480|
|BenQ RL2755HM.||27 inches, update frequency 75 Hz, response time 1 ms.||₽ 14 990.|
|MSI Optix Mag27c.||27 inches, curved screen, update frequency 144 Hz, response time 1 ms.||₽ 21 990.|
|AOC E970SWN.||19 inches, update frequency 60 Hz, response time 5 ms.||₽ 4 790.|
|Dell Computer Ultrasharp U2415||24 inches, update frequency 60 Hz, response time 5 ms.||₽ 21 490.|
|ASUS TUF GAMING VG279QM 27 "||27 inches, update frequency 280 Hz, response time 1 ms.||₽ 31 480.|
|AOC G2260VWQ6 21.5 "||21.5 inches, update frequency 76 Hz, response time 1 ms.||₽ 8 240.|
|Samsung u28e590d.||28 inches, update frequency 60 Hz, response time 1 ms.||₽ 16 990.|
|ASUS MG28UQ 28 "||28 inches, update frequency 60 Hz, response time 1 ms.||₽ 26 955|
|IIYAMA G-Master GB2730QSU-B1||27 inches, response time 1 ms, Screen format 16: 9||₽ 21 107.|
Read the same:
The best game mice
Top 4 TVs instead of monitor for games
Top 4K monitors
Rating of the best monitors by 27 inches
Rating of the best monitors by 24 inches
Best Eye Monitors